Page 63 of 71

Greta Thunberg is an odd duck

Greta Thunberg is an odd duck.  She has been catching some flak for deleting a tweet about 2023,  so there is a  Newsweek Fact Check of Greta Tweet to defend her.  Who cares?

When Greta stopped going to school in 9th grade to protest Climate Change, her protest became international news.  That was fishy from the start.  Kids protest all sorts of things, but somehow, this mentally fragile girl from Sweden has everyone’s attention.  It was clear that people with influence decided to exploit her to further their agenda.

Her neuro-divergence makes her an unpersuasive spokesman for environmental causes.  More than anything, she reminds me of a scary German comedian named Brother Theodore.  I will post a clip, but watch for this quote.  If Greta were more introspective, it could come from her.

I am what you might call a controversial figure.  People either hate me or despise me.  They would rather shake the devil by the tail than shake me by the hand, but with every failure David, with every failure, my reputation grows.  One of these days, you’ll see my picture on every postage stamp.  One of these days, I’ll furorize the world.

 

Electric school buses might make sense.

Electric school buses  may actually make sense.  Electric cars aren’t a good solution for most people because they take a long time to recharge and lose range quickly in cold weather. 

When I started at North Royalton a couple of decades ago, I forwarded information to the administration about a government program to subsidize the conversion of school buses to natural gas.  The district had some capped natural gas wells, so this could have been a great opportunity. 

Are we finally entering an era of electric school buses?

It appears that way: A growing number of school districts are upgrading their student transportation with electric buses. The Biden-Harris Administration has paved the way for electric school buses with resources and funding. 

School buses have tons of room for batteries.  A school bus has two steel beams for a frame, with the body resting on top.  Batteries could easily be nestled between the beams.  District maintenance garages would have access to 220 V charging, or even 480 V 3 phase power.  Home owners may not have 220 V available for a charger, so are looking at 8 hours for a full charge.  Not convenient.

Bus drivers have fixed routes, so running out of a charge isn’t likely.  Transportation for field trips and athletic events could be a concern.  A wise district would consider retaining a number of diesel buses for those uses.

Heating uses a ton of energy.  There is no way around that.  Engines produce waste heat, so heating the passenger compartment isn’t an issue.  For an electric vehicle, getting stuck in traffic in the Winter could end the trip.  For student pickup, buses are generally on surface streets and the entire route isn’t likely to challenge the vehicle range.

The rest of the article dwells on stupid stuff.

Electric buses also provide a smoother, better ride to and from school; fewer vibrations on the bus mean lower body fatigue for students and drivers.

Nobody cares about that.

A quieter ride means children are more likely to arrive at school with a calmer headspace, ready and eager to learn.

Or that.

Electric fleets give back more energy than they consume during the day, and each electric bus has enough charge to provide electricity to four to six homes for one day.

I can’t tell what that is supposed to mean.

A mindset shift. While electric buses cost more, this should be viewed as strategic long-term investment for the betterment of our communities.

That’s a problem.

Electric buses doesn’t sound like a bad idea, but the articles proposing that approach should be more realistic, rather than just throwing in everything the author can think of.  It makes me think they are lying about something.

Ozempic for weight loss

When my doctor tells me that I need to lose weight, I could tell him that I’ve tried 6 meals per day, 1 meal per day, eat early, eat late, low carb, low fat, joined a gym, bought an exercise bike, and everything else.  I don’t tell him that.  Instead, I say, “No shit.  Unless you want to write a script, let’s move on.”

My doctor is about my age, used to wrestle for St. Ignatius and knows what’s up.

Continue reading

Librarians don’t like normal people shushing them.

Librarians are not fans of No Left Turn .   Normal people are getting organized, and the degenerates aren’t comfortable with that.

The Atlantic: Librarians are not okay

The Atlantic: Librarians are not okay

The line for the tattoo station at the annual conference of the New York Library Association in Saratoga Springs was already snaking through the hotel lobby, and I hadn’t even had my first morning cup of coffee yet.

Normal people expect a librarian conference to be the dullest place on Earth.  Apparently Marion the Librarian has retired.

“This piece of it is nothing new to librarians,” Allison Grubbs, the director of the Broward County Libraries in Florida, told me. “What I think is new is some of the pathways that people are choosing to take.” Protests in and outside libraries and library board meetings have become more dramatic. Online, in Facebook groups such as “Informed Parents of California” and “Gays Against Grooming,” the language is more and more incendiary. And the librarians themselves are being personally attacked.

For clarification, by “personally attacked”, Ms. Grubbs must mean that librarians were criticized.  If assault had occurred, she wouldn’t be citing Facebook groups.  The language gets more direct when parents feel that their children are being threatened.

“​​I’ve been called a pedophile. I’ve been called a groomer. I’ve been called a Communist pornographer,” Cindy Dudenhoffer, a former president of the Missouri Library Association, told me. “I’ve been called all kinds of things. And I know many of my colleagues have been as well. It’s very hurtful.”

I went to a Tea Party rally to protest high taxes and the intrusiveness of the government.  That group was portrayed as white supremacists, anarchists and Nazis.  I don’t know Ms. Dudenhoffer, but wonder if she has talked to the people calling her those things and has considered why she is viewed so negatively.

Maybe Americans have gotten ruder, but it’s not only that. Online groups are coordinating protests of Drag Queen story hours, compiling lists of books to challenge, and strategizing ways to amend laws in order to censor books. “They might organize a protest and not even live in the state that that library serves,” Grubbs told me.

It’s troubling that Ms. Grubbs can’t see why having a kinky sex clown read to children is really fucked up.  Drag Queen story hours are not an isolated San Francisco phenomenon, but a trend picked up at libraries all over the country.  For library story hour, it wouldn’t be appropriate to have a young woman in a brass bikini reading Star Wars stories or a soldier bringing his sidearm and M-16 to read military adventures.  A serious person would understand that.

Given the lack of judgement demonstrated by Ms. Grubbs and like-minded librarians, it isn’t surprising that parents would organize to protect their children.  Ms. Grubbs should be thankful that its all organizing and petitioning, and not pitchforks and torches.

Librarians should speak with more precision.  Books are not being censored.  People are challenging the purchasing decisions made by public school employees.

“It’s really unfair to characterize displays or programs as ‘woke,’” Dudenhoffer lamented. “That’s just such a terrible word to use right now. But it’s not about that. It’s about serving our community, and everyone in the community, to the best of our abilities.”

Ms. Dudenhoffer should be aware that ‘woke’ is the kindest way to characterize her displays and programs.  “Degenerate propaganda”, “social Marxism”, “normalizing debauchery” or “grooming children” are other terms, but ‘woke’ is short and flexible.  

Adults with unconventional appetites find ways to satisfy themselves.  Keep that away from children.  Progressives always say they just want children to understand that people are different,  but in reality, it ends up with a degenerate wearing a rainbow wig jerking off a banana in front of a bunch of 6 year-olds.

Nice guy Pence doesn’t apologize to Buttigieg for a mild joke.

Pence defends joke about Buttigieg’s maternity leave , but doesn’t apologize.  Good for him.

“Pete is the only person in human history to have a child and everyone else gets postpartum depression,” Pence said Saturday at the Gridiron Dinner.

That’s a good joke.  After taking two weeks to tweet about the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, Buttigieg confirmed that he doesn’t feel any duty to do his job.  He’s just in it for the perks.

“The Gridiron Dinner is a roast. I had a lot of jokes directed to me, and I directed a lot of jokes to Republicans and Democrats,” he told reporters. “The only thing I can figure is Pete Buttigieg not only can’t do his job, but he can’t take a joke.”

I’m not used to Pence taking a stand.  Like he say, it’s the Gridiron Dinner, toughen up.  Pete’s response is weak beer.

“I spoke up because we all have an obligation to hold people accountable for when they say something wrong, especially when it’s misogynistic, especially when it’s homophobic, and I just don’t take that when it’s towards my family, and I don’t think anyone else would, especially when you bring a very small, medically fragile child into it,” he said.

Buttigieg’s bullshit answer tries to make him sound principled.  It isn’t about women or gay people, so it isn’t misogynistic or homophobic.  It’s about Pete not giving a shit about anyone or anything, but demonstrating his prestige by taking two months off while the air traffic control system was shutting down and travelers were stranded at airports.

When Pence didn’t apologize, Buttigieg realized that a nice, establishment, family guy is calling him out.  That can’t feel good.

Anti-CRT laws are working.

Laws prohibiting the teaching of CRT are an overreaction, but that is what we have been pushed to.  Parents will not allow their children to be taught divisive and corrosive Marxist theory.  If they have to use a hammer to resolve the problem, they will.

When 10 Black shoppers were killed at a Buffalo, N.Y., supermarket, allegedly by a white 18-year-old with a history of racist writings, history teacher Mary McIntosh didn’t know how to talk about it with her high schoolers in Memphis, Tenn.

Tennessee is one of 19 states with laws or rules designed to regulate how racism and issues of race are discussed in the classroom. The Buffalo shooting was a stark example of a national news event that McIntosh says she struggled to address with students, even while teaching to a predominantly Black and brown student body.

Current events are frequently discussed in history classes.  I’d be curious how this teacher would have discussed this tragedy if the anti-CRT were not passed and how the teacher did discuss it.  I’m not  certain why the teacher would choose to discuss this isolated crime as opposed to broader trends in crime.  Young Black men are shot by young Black men much more frequently than they are shot by the police or racist young White men.  That would be a valuable discussion.

“The Tennessee law does indeed have a big impact on how I can plan to teach with honesty and integrity,” she says.

The law, passed in May 2021, says it permits “impartial” discussions of the “controversial aspects of history” and “the historical oppression of a particular group of people.” But, teachers may not teach “resentment” of “a class of people” or that “an individual, by virtue of the individual’s race or sex, is inherently privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously.” Students, parents, or employees of a school can file complaints about teachers who violate the law. Schools found to have violated the law stand to lose 2% of their state funds or $1 million, whichever is less, for each violation.

It isn’t clear how a teacher could be confused by the clear instruction to not teach racism or racial resentment.  Implicit racism and microaggressions usually sound like a person can’t find any actual racism, so has to go to the sub-text.  It’s heresy to suggest that teachers could be presenting implicitly racist lessons to students, but that seems to be what the teachers are afraid they are doing.

In states from Colorado to Iowa, some bills required teachers to post their syllabi and all of their class readings online—opening them to challenges from parents, or activists who might agree with their decisions.

There is plenty of evidence that some teachers view parents as un-evolved genetic throwbacks who don’t know what’s best for their children.  To school administrators, it is not controversial to suggest that a child’s gender identity should be embraced and is information that should be withheld from parents.  When educators withhold information from parents, my default position is that the administrators are the bad guys.

My first year teaching, a student’s parent challenged my approach to teaching Physics.  He taught Physics in the Cleveland Metropolitan School District, and had a list of questions.  We went head-to-head on each issue.  He was a reasonable guy and, by the end of the meeting, offered to share his worksheets, labs and lab equipment with me.  None of it was very good, but I appreciated the gesture.  I went into the meeting thinking I was doing things properly, but open to any suggestions.

One Florida bill even proposed installing video cameras in classrooms.

This proposal is fraught with issues, but isn’t necessarily bad for teachers.  When police officers got body-cams, they were initially against the idea, but found that police brutality complaints dropped by 90%.  Student privacy is a concern.  Also, the purpose of the cameras would need to be well established.  A classroom camera would not be effective for distance learning.  If the teacher had unlimited access to the video, it could be useful for test security or for disciplinary purposes.

Since Florida passed the Stop WOKE Act, which aims to regulate how schools talk about race, in April, Matthew Bunch, who teaches advanced placement U.S. government in Miami Dade County, says he’s “dreading” teaching Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” next year because it addresses citizens’ right to challenge the government if they feel like their rights are being violated. “I don’t know how, without trampling on one of those landmines, we can actually talk about the document and what it means and what it influences.”

Mr. Bunch has to put some thought into his racial biases and examine his own heart for implicit racism.  That’s the hard thing.  Most teachers are regular people who aren’t particularly political.  Now that everything is political, that is changing.  It was no secret that I declined to join the union.  For one thing, I didn’t attend union meetings.  I was invited to, but didn’t feel it was appropriate.  The local union leadership was generally very good to me.  My feelings were known, but I didn’t challenge or threaten them.

At North Royalton, about 10% of the teachers were big Trump supporters and another 30% were generally conservative, however, they were all cautious about revealing that.  Since I was demonstrably conservative, they would talk to me.  About 5% were Leftist of the Woke variety, 20% were intelligent, classic Liberals, with the rest of the staff voted Democrat because they didn’t think about i

Mr. Bunch was not expecting any push-back from his reflexive Leftism.  I can see where that would not be comfortable.  When Liberals talk about change being good and inevitable, they don’t mean for themselves.

Gov. DeWine explains how to teach reading.

Gov. Mike DeWine announced a focus on phonics.

This article shows much of what’s wrong with public education. 

While Gov. Mike DeWine announced a renewed focus on phonics-based literacy in his recent State of the State address, several Northeast Ohio school districts told News 5 the transition is already underway.

It should not take the governor of a state to define educational methods.  We have a federal Department of Education, state department, regional education research centers and district curriculum directors.  What the hell have they been doing for the last few decades?

A phonics approach involves breaking down a word letter by letter and a student sounding out the word.

Other methods can teach words as a whole, not individual letters, based on taking context clues such as other words in a sentence or pictures as a way to recognize and remember the word.

Egyptian hieroglyphics is a character-based language.  China’s Mandarin or Japan’s Kanji are modern character-based languages.  Learning to read a character-based language is an all-or-nothing deal.  Whole word recognition is the only way to learn it. 

Western languages use an alphabet where symbols represent sounds, and can be combined to form words.  Even Western languages differ in how they are taught because the symbols and sounds are treated differently.

When I was posted near Madrid for a temporary foreign service assignment, I knew almost no Spanish.  Arrangements were made to have me attend an English language institute to learn Spanish.  My instructor was the headmaster of the school.  The lessons did not go well because the school taught English to Spaniards, so weren’t prepared to teach Spanish to an American.  The Madrid lisp made it worse. 

Everyone knows that “gracias” means “thank you”.  Americans would say, “gr-Ah-see-ahs”.  In Madrid, it’s pronounced, “gr-ah-Thee-ahs” with “thee” sounding like “theme”.  It’s the Madrid lisp.  This wasn’t explained to me, and sounded like a speech impediment.  I politely asked the headmaster if we were learning a dialect of Spanish.  He hit the roof.   We were in Alcalá de Henaras, which you may know, is the birthplace of Cervantes, who is the Shakespeare of the Spanish-speaking world.

The point is that the Caterpillar sales manager, who learned English by listening to the BBC, explained to me that Spanish is almost entirely phonetic.  After about an hour, anyone can learn to read Spanish pretty well with no comprehension.   Verbs are the tricky part.  Spanish teachers know this, and teach the language different than English would be taught.

English is a Germanic language with Romance language influence.  We have some confusing phonetics, like “Though” and “Through”.    Perhaps the trickiness of English left us open to alternative approaches.

It [recent research] showed that 3rd and 4th graders had lower tests scores if they didn’t utilize phonics as a primary teaching approach.  This came after decades of alternative teaching programs that came from places such as Columbia University and Ohio State University.

Colleges of Education were moving new teachers away from Phonics, toward innovative new ways to teach kids to read.  In education, when you see “innovative”, think “untested”.  Teachers did not make the decision to abandon Phonics.

“Some of our teachers feel guilty and they feel they let students down and these are some of the most dedicated, hard working individuals in the field,” he said. “They had been trusting what colleges and universities had been telling them they should be doing.”

In my experience, teachers want students to learn.  There is no joy in being ineffective and pointless.  Education professors, researchers and experts, need to publish and advocate for new methods to fix problems.  They don’t get attention for telling teachers to just keep doing what they are doing.

Teachers and curriculum directors were encouraged to embrace modern methods and that was a mistake.

 

Science says that race doesn’t make sense.

The National Academy of Science, Engineering and Medicine  says that race doesn’t make sense.

I didn’t want to say anything, but race in America hasn’t made any sense for decades.

Them:  “Don’t call us colored people.  We’re Black”

Us:  “James Brown said, ‘I’m black and I’m proud’, so we can say it out loud?”

Them:  “No, you say it too loud, like a racist. Call us African-American.”

Us: “Oh, like Elon Musk?”

Them: “Just because he was born in Africa and is an American, doesn’t make him an African-American.  Call us “People of Color”.

Us: “That’s just ‘colored people’, with the words mixed up.”

The report says researchers should not use race as a proxy for describing human genetic variation. Race is a social concept, but it is often used in genomics and genetics research as a surrogate for describing human genetic differences, which is misleading, inaccurate, and harmful.

Race is a social concept, not a genetic or scientific concept.  It’s imprecise and misleading.  That’s why we have so much trouble with the concept. People shouldn’t be categorized by race for any official purpose.

In education, racial statistics are very popular.  How different races compare on state mandated tests, school discipline or participation in AP classes, are all statistics that are given a lot of weight, but can’t actually mean anything.  How does the school know that a student is black?  No administrator is going to make that call.  When a student is enrolled in a school district, does a counselor ask?  It’s probably on a form, but how black is the kid?  The genetics company, 23 and Me, has millions of DNA samples.  They report that, on average, a person self-reporting as black, has 30% Caucasian genes.  Logically, Obama was probably more White than Black.  I know, you’re thinking that he looks Black, so he is Black.  Very imprecise and misleading. 

“Classifying people by race is a practice entangled with and rooted in racism, and the pernicious effects of applying this classification to genetics and genomics research have undeniably caused harm over the last century,” said Charmaine D. Royal, committee co-chair and Robert O. Keohane Professor of African and African American Studies, Biology, Global Health, and Family Medicine and Community Health at Duke University. “The lack of consistency in the use of population descriptors also presents problems for the accuracy and applicability of genomics research. The new framework and processes our report recommends can help our field produce more trustworthy science.”

So can we just stop doing that now? 

DOJ Lied about January 6th

DOJ lied and withheld video evidence.

“We did not receive that video footage,” Watkins said. “We asked for it, and not just once or twice. Whether we asked for it or not is irrelevant because the government had an absolute, non-compromisible duty to disclose that video and they did not do so.”

This is truly appalling.  With the government possessing all of the surveillance video, there is an obligation to share the information in a practical way with the defense attorneys.  Otherwise, the DOJ can target anyone using only the evidence they’d like to release.

Chansley had already entered a guilty plea which allowed him to get out of solitary confinement.

In America, the legal process is the punishment.  Was there any reason to put this guy in solitary confinement other than to torture him?  Was he a flight risk?  How many defendants were denied bail solely to punish them for the temerity to question the government.  Shameful.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Big Stick Physics

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑