Page 43 of 70

A small Reddit victory

While browsing the *Teachers* forum on Reddit, I read this post. 

If you want to keep your jobs, and preserve the education system as it currently stands, VOTE in the 2024 presidential election.

The text of the post was a rant about how Trump promised to dismantle public education and collapse democracy in America.  No one had commented, so I did:

The education system, as it currently stands, ain’t that great.

The original poster and a couple of dozen other people replied.  A third were supportive, so I engaged the other two-thirds.  Always be polite, but give no ground.

Several other people commented to disagree with the original post and started other threads.

After 200 comments, the original author withdrew her post.  My comment has 28 up votes.  I figured I’d be deep in negative numbers.

That’s a win.  Not only did she withdraw, but many conservative teachers know that they aren’t alone.

Sticking with the workout.

Since Davy and I started working out, I wanted to encourage symmetry.  Some machines allow for a different weight for each arm.   It made sense to start with the highest weight that either arm could handle.  I don’t want to develop a lobster claw, where one arm is much stronger than the other.  That might be a fiddler crab I’m thinking of.

Continue reading

WaPo: Google Gemini AI is worse than you think.

WaPo: Google Gemini Bias

WaPo: Google Gemini Bias

Megan McArdle is a columnist who I’ve followed for years.  Except for being a Never Trumper, she is generally insightful.

On Friday morning, when I first sat down to write this column, Google’s new Gemini AI was having problems that seemed mostly amusing. The internet had discovered that it would generally refuse to create pictures of any all-White groups, even in situations where it was clearly called for, such as “draw a picture of Nazis.” Gemini also insisted on gender diversity, even when drawing popes.

Continue reading

WaPo: Bunnies should be your next pet.

WaPo: Rabbits are Better Pets

WaPo: Rabbits are Better Pets

Cats and dogs have an outsize carbon footprint, mostly because of their carnivorous diet. If the pet food industry, which mainly feeds dogs and cats, were a country, it would rank as the 60th-highest greenhouse gas emitter, equivalent to the Philippines.

When I was an RA at Ohio State my senior year, me and a few other RA’s got a bunny.  We named him Travis.  I don’t recall how or why we got a pet rabbit.  Lisa, an RA in Barrett, was very sweet and loved animals, so it was probably her idea.  Scott and I liked spontaneous dumb ideas, so we were in, and Barb liked being in on the secret.

Continue reading

A newly popular alternative to cigarettes is changing the way many Americans consume nicotine—and becoming a political flashpoint.
The product, a nicotine pouch, looks like a tiny tea bag and comes in flavors such as mint, coffee, berry and mango. It tucks discreetly into the cheek and doesn’t require the user to spit.

I have never smoked a cigarette in my life.  Pulling hot smoke into your lungs always seemed like a bad idea.  When I was young, I figured that lungs were moist, pink mucus membranes kind of like the inside of your mouth.  Hot smoke would dry them out and damage them. 

Continue reading

You Don’t Hit Girls

Why not?

Kids ask questions all the time.  That’s what they are supposed to do as their brains try to construct a model of reality.  Occasionally, they ask difficult questions.  The cliche is, “Why is the sky blue?”  That’s an easy question, but not enough writers took physics.

“You don’t hit girls.”

Now that’s a difficult question.  If asked, most parents would say, “Well, you shouldn’t hit anyone.  Violence doesn’t solve anything.”

That’s a stupid answer, but kids are still trying to figure things out, so the parent can talk for a little while to redirect the conversation.  Kids don’t have any power, so telling them that violence doesn’t solve anything, doesn’t put them at a big disadvantage.  By the time they are powerful enough to employ real violence, they have learned about the Civil War, animal attacks and the Second Amendment.

Why are boys told not to hit girls?

It’s not because girls are fragile.  Girls aren’t taught to be fragile, and they aren’t.  For a 5 year-old, a 6 year-old is 20% older.  A girl can be taller, stronger and more coordinated than a boy because of an age difference or growth rate.  Girls can be just as aggressive or mean-spirited as boys, but they tend to have better impulse control.

Boys are told not to hit girls because we don’t want men to hit women.

By high school, most boys are taller and stronger than most girls.  That is statistically true, but our current culture insists that there are no innate differences between men and women.  That is competes with the other well-established assertion that, biologically, humans are animals.  Every other species we have studied has obvious and observable behavioral and anatomical differences between males and females.

Why should men not hit women?

In a physical fight, a typical man can do significant damage to a typical woman.  Most of us aren’t typical.  A big, strong person can do significant damage to a smaller and weaker person.  Also, it doesn’t have to be a melee battle.  Women can buy guns or pepper spray.  Assault with a motor vehicle is an option available to most adults.

Women are not inherently better people.  According to the National Domestic Violence Fact Sheet
 “1 in 4 women and 1 in 9 men experience severe intimate partner physical violence,”

That can only be an approximation, but half the instances of domestic violence, is still significant.  Men are less likely to report an incident, so it’s probably more than 1 in 9.

An LA TImes article talks about the first Men’s Domestic Violence Shelter opened in the US.  This is in 1994.  The shelter has difficulty getting funding and the founder’s motives are questioned.

“You don’t hit girls” cause men to under report violence and society to deny assistance when needed.

In general, men are more impulsive and direct.  “You don’t hit girls” is training meant to put a deep, instinctive constraint on men to overcome an immediate confrontation.  Men need that.   As a boy matures, the message can become more sophisticated.  “Pick on someone your own size” and criminal assault can send you to jail.

If men are more impulsive and direct, then women are more evasive and indirect.  Nobody mentions that. 

Admiral Ackbar explains another reason why men should not hit women.

When I was a young teenager, I overheard my parents talking about friends of theirs in a troubled marriage.   Apparently the wife, unprovoked, grabbed the husband’s nuts when he was getting dressed in the morning.  He smacked her.  It was clear that she was looking for this response to improve her grounds for a divorce.

That’s a disturbing story, but not unique.  If women have the capacity to be bad people and can be conniving, it’s prudent to be restrained.

I’ve never hit a woman.  Whether or not I would, is like asking if I could shoot someone.  I don’t know.  It depends on the circumstances, and even then, I can’t be certain.  If it was one of those random urban attacks by a gang of unhinged 15 year-old she-demons, I’d be justified in defending myself.  Until the situation presents itself, none of us can be sure what we’d do.  I’d prefer not to find out.

When a boy is told to never hit a girl, and asks why not, is that the time to explain feminine wiles?

The TV Show, Reacher. 8/10

The Atlantic: Reacher Review

I started watching the TV show, Reacher, a couple of months ago, and really enjoyed it.  On social media, it gets criticized quite often.  That’s fine, not everyone likes the same shows, but the review in The Atlantic is illuminating.  Sophisticated people don’t like Reacher.

Amazon’s Reacher, the second season of which wraps up this week, is among the most-watched shows in the country.

I like it, and so do a lot of other people.  It’s got an 8.1 rating on IMDB.

It’s as if our collective imaginative power source, its fuses blown, has switched over to some kind of small, noisy backup generator. Enough with nuance, enough with finesse.

You get it?  The popularity of Reacher is indicative of a malfunction in America.   How could a show that doesn’t address contemporary issues, politics or anything controversial, be such a threat to the deep-thinkers?

Reacher is pure masculinity, so the opposite of a Progressive.  Reacher has a strict moral code that he lives by.  He doesn’t force anyone to live like him.  He doesn’t talk about it, he just does it.  He is not a victim or a victimizer. Everything he is, is the opposite of Progressives and the political elite. 

It helps that the casting, directing and writing are well-done.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Big Stick Physics

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑