Category: Science (Page 1 of 2)

The Physics industry is broken.

The 20th Century was the Century of Physics.  In 1905, Einstein published his “Special Theory of Relativity”, and up to about World War 2, modern physics was established.  Very little of modern physics corresponds with what we experience in daily life, but it’s been experimentally verified and is used in current technology.

Physicists like Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Max Planck, and others debated the new theories, and tried to make some sense of the universe.

Continue reading

Study says you should get a cat if you want.

Science Alert: Owning a cat could make you a schizophrenic

Having a cat as a pet could potentially double a person’s risk of schizophrenia-related disorders, according to a recent study.

Full disclosure:  I am biased against cats.  I am convinced that having a cat isn’t nearly as good as having Sparky.  Except for barn cats.  If I had a real barn, I’d have barn cats.

Even with my bias, if a person wants a cat, don’t worry about this study.  The risk of schizophrenia is seven in a thousand.  A fourteen in a thousand chance is very low, and other risk factors are more pertinent.

Habitually smoking a mess of pot increases the risk about as much.

Scientific American is discredited.

City Journal: Unscientific American

My fourth year teaching at Normandy, I was the department chair.  My department was concerned that students didn’t know the scientific method.  I taught all Physics and Honors Physics, so figured my kids certainly knew how science worked.  Sure, they could list some steps, but they couldn’t really think scientifically.

Around the same time, John Stossel, at ABC News, had done a special on pseudoscience, called, The Power of Belief.   It seems a little quaint now, but it was an engaging look at unscientific beliefs that were popular in the culture.   Magic crystals, past lives, faith healing, past lives, that sort of thing.

Continue reading

WSJ: Medical effects of marijuana

WSJ: Pot and health

WSJ: Pot and health

Being naturally lethargic, marijuana isn’t for me.  Being naturally libertarian, I don’t care what other people do so long as it doesn’t ruin things for everyone else. 

The “marijuana is good for everything and has no downsides” angle that shows up most in media sounds too much like propaganda.  The Reefer Madness  side isn’t convincing either.

A 2022 survey sponsored by the National Institutes of Health found that 28.8% of Americans age 19 to 30 had used marijuana in the preceding 30 days—more than three times as many as smoked cigarettes. Among those 35 to 50, 17.3% had used weed in the previous month, versus 12.2% for cigarettes.

Marijuana is everywhere.  People should be a little more concerned.

For starters, she says, the “addiction potential of marijuana is as high or higher than some other drug,” especially for young people. About 30% of those who use cannabis have some degree of a use disorder. By comparison, only 13.5% of drinkers are estimated to be dependent on alcohol. Sure, alcohol can also cause harm if consumed in excess. But Ms. Madras sees several other distinctions.

Professor Madras sounds scientific, impartial and alarmed.  I don’t know if she is correct, but more actual scientific research and informed policy would be prudent.

Instead of bankrolling ballot initiatives to legalize pot, she says, George Soros and other wealthy donors who “catalyzed this whole movement” should be funding rigorous research:

George Soros seems evil and only funds chaos in order to undermine civilization, so this is troubling.  Maybe I’m wrong.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson presentation on “Delusions of Space Enthusiasts”. 7/10.

Friends invited me to attend a talk by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, last night, at the State Theater.  Our group represented half of North Royalton High School’s Science Department.  The half that attends a lecture by an astrophysicist is the same half that is actively disdained by the high school administration.  Two of us retired early, one is retiring in a month, one is engaged in a district dispute due to unfair treatment by the principal and one was passed over for department chair so an administration shill could be installed.

Continue reading

WaPo: Stop worrying about honey bees

WaPo: Record number of honey bees

WaPo: Record number of honey bees

After almost two decades of relentless colony collapse coverage and years of grieving suspiciously clean windshields, we were stunned to run the numbers on the new Census of Agriculture (otherwise known as that wonderful time every five years where the government counts all the llamas): America’s honeybee population has rocketed to an all-time high.

When I started keeping bees 15 years ago, the corporate media was covering the impending environmental catastrophe of honey bee extinction.  To populate a bee colony, a beekeeper can purchase a 3 lb package of bees.  That’s around 30,000 live bees with a queen.  When I started, a package cost about $120.  The price has gone up about $5 per year, but never drastically from year to year.  That convinced me that honey bee extinction wasn’t likely.

To summarize, this census only counts beekeepers with more than five hives.  It would also only count beekeepers who register their hives.  I never registered mine.

The challenges to bee colonies still exist, but various treatments mitigate the problem.

Changes in Texas tax law made it advantages to keep bees and register hives, so many more people did.

Honey bees are not indigenous to the US.  Many other insects pollinate plants.

My beekeeper instructor told the class that wild honeybees no longer exist.  The article suggests that the increase in domesticated bees will threaten wild honeybees.

Like most impending environmental catastrophes, people involved are managing the issues and the rest of us don’t have to worry about it.

« Older posts

© 2024 Big Stick Physics

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑